Pages

Monday, December 17, 2012

Punggol East: 29 out of 30 residents feel that there should be a by-election

I read the following article online:

http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC121215-0000040/Punggol-East-back-in-the-spotlight

The Headline is "Punggol East back in the spotlight."  The sub-headline reads: "Many residents aren't thinking of a by-election yet; they're still in shock over the loss of an MP who was clearly popular."

My first reaction in reading the sub-headline was to think that unfortunately most Singaporeans don't seem to appreciate the need for Parliamentary representation in a democracy. 

As I read further, I came across the following:




 "...for many of the residents, the thought of going to the polls again has not sunk in yet. They are still reeling in shock over the loss of an MP who was clearly popular among the residents."



The impression that was building in me was that a majority of Punggol East residents are uninterested in the issue of having a by-election.  Further down in the article comes the following:




"Among the 30 residents TODAY spoke to, 13 felt that a by-election should be called within three months. Slightly more than half (16) felt that there was no rush, and one said there was no need to elect a new MP for the constituency."


Firstly, this is not a properly conducted survey.  So, it is not going to be sufficiently representative of residents' sentiments and a wide margin of error must be accounted for. 

I find the 'findings' made by TODAY to be rather amusing especially for the impression that they were trying to create.  Clearly, by stating that 13 felt that there should be a by-election within 3 months and more than half felt that there was no rush, TODAY is brushing over a very important fact.  Of the 30 persons interviewed, 29 actually thought that there is a need for a by-election.  Only one person thought that there was no need to elect a new MP.  If the information was presented in this way, it would not aid the overall impression that the PAP probably wants to create: that there is no necessity for a by-election and that municipal duties of the MP can be performed by an MP from a neighbouring constituency (and that many residents are not interested in a by-election). 

TODAY's unscientific straw poll (after reading in between the lines) restores (in mymind at least) some faith in my fellow citizens.  We are not about to roll over and play dead.  Clearly, many want to see the Parliamentary vacancy filled.  I expect that there is bound to be disagreement as to whether by-elections should be held as soon as within 3 months of the vacancy.  But, only the hardcore PAP apologists would preach on the merits of an empty Parliamentary seat, the acceptability of an unrepresented Constituency and the disenfranchisement of about 31,000 voters. 

Coming back to TODAY's article.  This appears to be just part and parcel of the whole business of perception management:  presenting information in a technically accurate but linguistically 'massaged' form to create the impression that there is not much public support for a by election. 

Well, so long as you keep a healthy ability of not taking information at face value, you won't be caught in the matrix. 

(To put an opposite spin the information: 96% of Punggol East residents want a by-election.  :-) )

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

The local press is no better than the old Pravda. I suspect journalists in Singapore are card-carrying PAP members.

Anonymous said...

No Rush doesn't mean No Need. Period.

Anonymous said...

so what exactly is the point you are trying to make, actually?

Anonymous said...

Legally the PM does not need to call a by-election. And legally the 15 TCs tranferring the ownership of the jointly developed software system to AIM and dormant company with 3 former MPs as Director is also not illegal. That the TCs are leasing back the system and that AIM has terminated Aljunied TC contract is also legal but then it makes you sick in the guts to see just unethical cowardly behaviour from so called great leaders. Dog shit if you tell me.

Anonymous said...

Going by the usual style of the MSM, I am surprised they did not say "MOST residents felt there was no need for by-elections". You are right in that our MSM is very effective in framing your thinking using 8-10 simple words in the headers.

My message to the PM: Stop hiding behind the law and do what is right for the residents of Punggol-East.

Anonymous said...

Remember this is the PM who had to resort to saying sorry just before the last election. Do you think he is really a GENTLEMAN that he tries to portray himself to be?

A real gentleman wouldn't have to resort to unscrupulous tricks to con the electorate prior to the last GE, what do you think?

Anonymous said...

Any survey result report by the local MSM has to be taken by a pinch of salt, No a sackful of it.
Or read between the headline and the actual results and see the slant

Dr Purva Pius said...

Do you need a loan to pay off your bill or in need of financial help with a loan you can contact us now for a loan if you are serious in getting it surely we will help you out via Email {urgentloan22@gmail.com}